Search Our Resource Collection

Identifying Building Heights over 32 ft for the City of Franklin Fire Department

Author: Geocue, May 11, 2018

The Challenge

Use LIDAR data to identify buildings over 32 ft (3 stories) in height for the City of Franklin Fire Department to maintain a building database with elevation information.

The Solution

The Franklin Fire Department asked if our GIS department could identify all of the buildings within the city limits that were over 32ft or 3 stories tall. This information was needed on behalf of the ladder company for a new ISO insurance rating purpose. Building height data was currently not being maintained, so we turned to our LIDAR data as a source to extract the elevation information required. Using LP360 we were able to render the height information needed for each structure and create not only a qualitative but also a quantitative analysis based on the building footprint shapefile.

To accomplish this, I first classified and generated squared footprints for all the buildings. (Figure 1)

Classify and Generate Building Footprints

To accomplish this, I first classified and generated squared footprints for all the buildings. (Figure 1)

Figure 1 – Sample area of classified and squared footprints of the buildings

Determine Building Height Above Ground

The heights in LP360 are absolute (above sea level) (Figure 2). For our purposes we needed to determine building height above ground so the next step requires the creation of the height (Z value) for each building, relative to the ground.

Figure 2 – Building profile with absolute building heights

One of the byproducts of the LP360 Volumetric Analysis Point Cloud Task is the option to generate a new LAS file for a subject area that have heights relative to ground. The resulting LAS file will contain only the exported building points (displayed by classification). (Figure 3)

Figure 3 – Resultant LAS file from the Volumetric Point Cloud Tasks displayed by classification

As you can see in the LP360 Profile View (Figure 4) the resultant height is now relative to ground as opposed to absolute as we saw in Figure 2.

Figure 4 – LP360 Profile Window with building heights displayed relative to ground.

Now, in order to get the quantitative part of the solution I again used an LP360 point cloud task to conflate the building points and created the final building height shape file with the applicable attributes (Figure 5).

Figure 5 - MaxZ values

Using LP360’s comprehensive toolbox it was easy to create and implement a workflow and provide the information required.

- Jake Harvey, GIS Analyst

The resulting footprint has an updated attribute table that includes the building heights (MaxZ value). Sorting these by ascending order, we see that there are several buildings in this sample area over 32 feet tall (keep in mind the transition from Meters (of the dataset) to Feet) (Figure 5).

Returning to the Profile view (Figure 6), you can quickly view the highest section of the structure to again perform a qualitative analysis and verify the findings for accuracy. Based on the initial classification, this building checks out to the MaxZ value from the attribute table.

This solution worked successfully with only a small margin of error. This error being due to areas of the data being misclassified. An address list was then rendered based on location of each 32ft+ building. Using LP360’s comprehensive toolbox it was easy to implement a workflow and provide the information required.

Figure 6 - Verifying MaxZ height

Type: Case Studies
Categories: Resources
Topics: LP360

How Can We Help Your Business?